That women appear as legendary rulers is perhaps not surprising, but their failure to appear on the coins suggests that they did not in fact actually rule, as the coins quickly changed from depicting the Athenian goddess Athena to depicting male rulers and male gods. Viewed from the coins alone, one would rapidly draw the conclusion that women's roles in public life were purely legendary and that their participation was limited to the conventional assumptions. The same conclusion could be drawn from the Assyrian texts a decade or two later, as by the end of the eighth century B.C.E, Assyrian sources mention kings and not queens in association with Saba. The first coins date to a period many centuries later than this. Should we then draw the conclusion that early Yemeni society was ruled by women, and that it was then transformed into a masculine society? Or should we simply assume that the legendary women were part of the exotic tales of far-off Yemen?
|
|
